PDF

Int J Med Sci 2025; 22(11):2802-2815. doi:10.7150/ijms.110366 This issue Cite

Research Paper

Efficacy of Acupuncture in Managing Radiation-Induced Xerostomia: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Ru-Yin Tsai^1,2 , Sheng-Yi Lin^1,2, Chin-Chang Chen^1,2, Yao Hsiao³

1. Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan. geoge6211@csmu.edu.tw (CCC); shengyi@csmu.edu.tw (SYL).
2. Department of Medical Education, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, Taiwan.
3. School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan. s1001085@gm.csmu.edu.tw.

✉ Corresponding author: Ru-Yin Tsai, PhD, Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Sec. 1, Jianguo N. Rd, Taichung, Taiwan, Tel: +886 424730022 ext. 11613, e-mail: iris8084edu.tw.com.

Received 2025-1-13; Accepted 2025-5-16; Published 2025-5-31

Abstract

Background: Xerostomia, or dry mouth, frequently affects head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, leading to discomfort and impacting daily functions such as speaking and swallowing. Conventional treatments may offer limited relief and are often accompanied by undesirable side effects. Acupuncture, as a non-pharmacological intervention, is increasingly explored for its potential to mitigate xerostomia symptoms.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture in improving symptoms and quality of life in patients experiencing radiation-induced xerostomia.

Methods: A thorough literature search was conducted across several databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science, up to the current year. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated acupuncture's impact on salivary flow and symptom relief in adults with radiation-induced xerostomia. Primary outcomes were changes in salivary flow, with secondary outcomes including patient-reported symptom severity and quality of life metrics. The risk of bias was evaluated, and data were synthesized using a random-effects model.

Results: A total of 11 RCTs involving 1271 participants were included in the analysis. The pooled data showed a moderate increase in salivary flow in the acupuncture group, effective in both resting and stimulated conditions. Additionally, acupuncture demonstrated significant benefits in reducing xerostomia symptoms and improving quality of life scores compared to control interventions. Subgroup analysis revealed that traditional acupuncture was more effective than Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS).

Conclusions: The findings suggest that acupuncture may be an effective complementary treatment for radiation-induced xerostomia, offering relief from dry mouth symptoms and potentially improving quality of life. Further research should focus on standardizing acupuncture protocols to confirm these benefits across diverse patient populations.

Keywords: cancer, systematic reviews, salivary flow, dry mouth, quality of life.

Introduction

Xerostomia, commonly referred to as dry mouth, is a frequently reported complication among patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancers [1]. It is essential to distinguish between xerostomia and hyposalivation: while xerostomia describes the subjective sensation of oral dryness, hyposalivation refers to the objectively measured reduction in salivary flow [2]. Although the two often coexist, patients may report xerostomia despite normal salivary output, and vice versa, highlighting the need to address both subjective symptoms and physiological markers in clinical management [3]. Radiation-induced xerostomia results primarily from damage to the salivary glands, leading to diminished salivary production [4]. This condition can severely impair oral functions such as speaking, chewing, and swallowing, thereby diminishing quality of life and nutritional status [5]. Furthermore, insufficient saliva compromises the oral microbiome, increasing susceptibility to dental caries, mucosal infections, and overall oral discomfort, complicating recovery and long-term survivorship [4].

While pharmacological agents, such as pilocarpine, are available for managing xerostomia, their effectiveness is often limited and may come with side effects like sweating and gastrointestinal discomfort [6]. As a result, there is growing interest in exploring non-pharmacological therapies like acupuncture, which has shown potential in alleviating xerostomia symptoms by enhancing residual salivary gland function through neurovascular stimulation [3, 5]. Acupuncture is thought to influence salivary secretion pathways and may stimulate the autonomic nervous system to increase salivary flow, thereby potentially offering symptom relief without adverse effects [7, 8].

Several studies and preliminary reviews suggest that acupuncture may improve salivary flow and reduce xerostomia severity in patients' post-radiotherapy [9, 10]. However, these reviews have often been limited by small sample sizes and variation in study methodologies. To provide a clearer understanding of acupuncture's effectiveness in this context, a comprehensive and updated meta-analysis is warranted. This study aims to consolidate existing RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in managing radiation-induced xerostomia, offering a more definitive assessment of its role in supporting recovery and enhancing patient quality of life.

Materials and Methods

Data sources and selection criteria

Our study conducted a thorough search of RCTs evaluating the effects of acupuncture on radiation-induced xerostomia. We systematically searched multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, for studies published up to September 2024. The search strategy incorporated terms such as "(acupuncture OR transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation OR TENS OR pharmacopuncture) AND (radiation OR radiotherapy OR radiation therap* OR therap*, radiation OR radiation treatment*) AND (xerostomia OR hyposalivation OR Mouth Dryness)," focusing exclusively on clinical trials involving human participants. The review process strictly followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All identified articles were screened, and their reference lists were examined for additional relevant studies. Exclusions included case reports, technical papers, conference abstracts, reviews, letters, editorials, and preclinical or laboratory-based studies. This meta-analysis has been registered with PROSPERO under registration number CRD42024581756.

Selection of studies

The screening and assessment of studies were performed independently by two researchers, with a third researcher supervising the process to ensure accuracy and consistency. To support a comprehensive review, physical copies of all eligible articles were obtained and meticulously analyzed. The full study selection process is detailed in the PRISMA flow diagram (Figure 1).

 Figure 1 

Flowchart depicting the study selection process for this systematic review and meta-analysis on acupuncture interventions for radiation-induced xerostomia. Of the 277 records initially identified, 11 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis.

Data extraction

Data extraction was carried out independently by two authors using a standardized template developed in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook guidelines [11]. The extracted information included key study details, such as author names, publication year, study location, participant eligibility criteria, demographic characteristics (e.g., total sample size and age range), study design, intervention specifics, reported outcomes, and the methods used for outcome assessment.

Outcomes

The primary outcomes of this study focused on assessing resting salivary flow rates (RSF) and stimulated salivary flow rates (SSF). Secondary outcomes included xerostomia questionnaire scores (XQ) and measures of quality of life (QoL).

Assessment of methodological quality

Two independent researchers conducted a thorough evaluation of potential biases in the included studies using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool to assess methodological quality. Discrepancies in their assessments were resolved through detailed discussions with a third reviewer until a consensus was achieved. Studies were deemed to have a high risk of bias if significant concerns were identified in one or more domains outlined by the assessment tool.

Data analysis

Quantitative analysis of the selected studies was performed using the Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) to compare outcomes between intervention and control (placebo) groups. The SMD values were pooled using a random-effects model to account for inter-study variability. Statistical analyses were conducted with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, version 3 (Version 3.0 Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA). Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I² statistic, with values exceeding 50% considered indicative of substantial heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed through funnel plot visualization and Egger's regression test, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05 for most analyses and p < 0.10 for publication bias assessment. Subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity, while sensitivity analyses were performed by sequentially excluding individual studies to evaluate the stability of the overall results.

Results

Study search and characteristics of included patients

The trial screening and selection process is depicted in Figure 1. An initial search across four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) identified 277 trials. After removing duplicates, 89 trials proceeded to title and abstract screening, resulting in the exclusion of 19 studies. A detailed full-text review of the remaining 19 trials led to the exclusion of four additional studies due to unavailable full texts (1 trial [12]), irrelevant outcomes (4 trials [13-16]), guideline (1 trial [17]), no placebo (1 trial [18]), and inconsistent study designs (1 trial [19]). Ultimately, 11 trials [3, 5, 7-10, 20-24] met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into this meta-analysis. All included studies were published in English. Table 1 summarizes the key characteristics of these trials, which were conducted between 1996 and 2024, involving a total of 1159 participants, with sample sizes ranging from 6 to 115 per study. Each trial assessed the effectiveness of acupuncture in managing radiation-induced xerostomia.

Quality assessment

The quality assessment of the included trials is presented in Figure 2A and 2B. Of the studies analyzed, four were determined to have a low risk of bias, attributed to their accuracy in reporting results [3, 5, 22, 24]. Regarding randomization methods, nine trials were classified as having a low risk of bias [3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 20, 22-24]. However, some concerns were identified in four trials [7, 8, 10, 23] and three trials [9, 20, 21], were judged to have a high risk of bias due to deviations from the intended interventions. Furthermore, all trials raised concerns over the absence of blinding, as outcome assessors were aware of treatment allocations, potentially introducing detection bias. Additionally, two trials [9, 21] presented some concerns regarding selective reporting, as they lacked a clearly pre-registered protocol or predefined analysis plan, increasing the likelihood of outcome reporting bias.

Impact of acupuncture on RSF and SSF

The intervention demonstrated a modest effect on improving salivary flow rates in patients with radiation-induced xerostomia. As illustrated in Figure 3A, the SMD for moderate improvement in resting salivary flow (RSF) was -0.601 (95% CI: -0.907 to -0.296; I² = 57.68%, p = 0.021). Subgroup analysis (Figure 3B) showed that acupuncture had a moderate effect on RSF (SMD: -0.761, 95% CI: -1.177 to -0.345; I² = 60.12%, p = 0.028), whereas no significant effect was observed for TENS (SMD: -0.294, 95% CI: -0.612 to 0.024; I² = 12.16%, p = 0.286). Similarly, the intervention showed moderate improvement in stimulated salivary flow (SSF), as indicated in Figure 4A, with an SMD of -0.596 (95% CI: -0.920 to -0.273; I² = 63.54%, p = 0.008). Subgroup analysis (Figure 4B) revealed that acupuncture had a significant moderate effect on SSF (SMD: -0.760, 95% CI: -1.154 to -0.366; I² = 55.81%, p = 0.045), while no significant effect was identified for TENS (SMD: -0.255, 95% CI: -0.750 to 0.241; I² = 64.73%, p = 0.092). These findings suggest that acupuncture is moderately effective in enhancing both RSF and SSF among patients with radiation-induced xerostomia, whereas TENS does not exhibit significant efficacy in this context.

Effect of acupuncture on XQ and QoL

Acupuncture was found to moderately reduce the frequency and severity of dry mouth symptoms, as illustrated in Figure 5A (SMD: -0.618, 95% CI: -0.897 to -0.339; I² = 64.60%, p = 0.006). Subgroup analysis (Figure 5B) further indicated that acupuncture had a moderate impact on reducing symptom frequency and severity (SMD: -0.702, 95% CI: -1.040 to -0.364; I² = 68.84%, p = 0.004), while TENS demonstrated only a small effect (SMD: -0.360, 95% CI: -0.703 to -0.017; I² = 0%, p = 1). Additionally, acupuncture showed a moderate positive effect on quality of life, as shown in Figure 6A (SMD: -0.510, 95% CI: -0.780 to -0.239; I² = 67.45%, p = 0.005). Subgroup analysis (Figure 6B) confirmed that acupuncture provided a significant improvement in QoL (SMD: -0.593, 95% CI: -0.980 to -0.207; I² = 76.97%, p = 0.002), whereas TENS demonstrated only a minimal effect (SMD: -0.365, 95% CI: -0.645 to 0.086; I² = 0%, p = 0.389). These results highlight acupuncture's moderate efficacy in alleviating dry mouth symptoms and enhancing quality of life, while TENS exhibits a comparatively smaller impact.

Publishing bias

Funnel plots (Figure 7) illustrate the standardized mean differences for the effectiveness of acupuncture interventions in improving RSF among patients with radiation-induced xerostomia, as shown in Figure 3A. Egger regression analysis revealed minimal publication bias (p = 0.078).

Discussion

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of acupuncture in managing radiation-induced xerostomia, revealing moderate improvements in both resting and stimulated salivary flow rates, as well as reductions in the frequency and severity of dry mouth symptoms. Acupuncture also demonstrated significant enhancements in patients' quality of life. These findings align with previous studies that suggest acupuncture's potential to stimulate salivary gland function through autonomic nervous system activation and local vascular modulation.

Our results showed that acupuncture had a moderate effect on salivary flow rates and patient-reported outcomes, with consistent improvements across subgroup analyses. These effects are clinically meaningful, as increased salivary flow contributes to better oral hydration and reduced discomfort for patients undergoing radiotherapy. Furthermore, improvements in quality of life highlight the broader impact of acupuncture on patient well-being, beyond symptom management. Acupuncture's impact on RSF may be attributed to its ability to activate parasympathetic pathways [25-27], which are crucial for basal salivary secretion. By targeting specific acupoints associated with autonomic regulation, such as LI4 (Hegu), SP6 (Sanyinjiao), and CV24 (Chengjiang) [9], acupuncture may enhance the baseline activity of salivary glands. Moreover, the neurovascular effects of acupuncture, including increased local blood flow [28] to the parotid and submandibular glands [20, 29], likely contribute to improved glandular function and RSF. The improvement in SSF reflects acupuncture's ability to augment salivary production under stimulated conditions, such as chewing or gustatory responses [30]. This could be mediated through the activation of central neural pathways that enhance the responsiveness of the salivary glands. Additionally, acupuncture-induced modulation of inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-6, may reduce glandular inflammation and fibrosis caused by radiation therapy, further improving stimulated salivary output [31, 32].

 Figure 2 

Assessment of methodological quality of the included trials. (A) Risk of bias for each included study. (B) The overall summary of bias of the ten studies.

The significant improvements in RSF and SSF underscore acupuncture's utility as a comprehensive treatment for radiation-induced xerostomia. Resting salivary flow is essential for maintaining oral hydration and mucosal health [33], while stimulated salivary flow is crucial for functions like chewing, swallowing, and speaking [34]. By addressing both aspects, acupuncture provides multifaceted relief for patients, enhancing their overall quality of life. Further studies should aim to explore the long-term sustainability of RSF and SSF improvements following acupuncture. Additionally, research into optimal treatment regimens, including the duration and frequency of sessions, could enhance the therapeutic potential of acupuncture for xerostomia management.

 Figure 3 

Visualization of the effects of acupuncture on resting salivary flow. Panel (A) highlights the overall impact on resting salivary flow, while panel (B) presents subgroup analyses by treatment type. In the forest plots, squares indicate standardized mean differences favoring acupuncture (shifted to the left), with horizontal lines representing the 95% confidence intervals. The diamond symbol at the bottom reflects the pooled effect size.

 Figure 4 

Illustration of the effects of acupuncture on stimulated salivary flow. Panel (A) shows the overall impact on stimulated salivary flow, while panel (B) provides subgroup analyses by treatment type. In the forest plots, squares represent standardized mean differences favoring acupuncture (shifted to the left), with horizontal lines indicating the 95% confidence intervals. The diamond symbol at the bottom summarizes the pooled effect size.

Subgroup analyses revealed that traditional acupuncture outperformed transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in all primary and secondary outcomes. While TENS showed small effects on salivary flow and quality of life [35], the lack of significant improvements suggests that traditional acupuncture may engage more complex mechanisms, such as deeper neuromodulation or enhanced blood flow to salivary glands [25, 26]. These findings indicate that traditional acupuncture should remain the preferred modality for managing radiation-induced xerostomia. The observed differences in efficacy may be attributed to the distinct mechanisms of action of acupuncture and TENS. Acupuncture involves needle insertion into specific acupoints, which may activate both the autonomic nervous system and local neurovascular pathways [36], leading to enhanced salivary gland function. It also stimulates deep structures, potentially eliciting a more profound systemic response [32]. In contrast, TENS delivers electrical impulses through the skin, targeting superficial nerves without penetrating deep tissues [35]. This difference could explain the comparatively limited effects of TENS, particularly in addressing complex symptoms such as dry mouth severity and quality of life. While TENS may still have a role, particularly in settings where acupuncture is unavailable or for patients who are averse to needles, its limited efficacy underscores the need for careful consideration of its application.

Moderate to high heterogeneity (I² ranging from 55% to 77%) was observed in several outcomes, likely reflecting differences in study protocols, acupuncture techniques, and patient characteristics. Additionally, Egger's regression analysis suggested potential publication bias (p = 0.078). The asymmetry in funnel plots indicates the possibility of unpublished studies with negative results. This bias could overestimate the reported effects, underscoring the need for future research to include unpublished trials or grey literature to minimize bias.

 Figure 5 

Depict of the effects of acupuncture on xerostomia questionnaire scores. Panel (A) presents the overall impact on xerostomia questionnaire scores, while panel (B) includes subgroup analyses by treatment type. In the forest plots, squares represent standardized mean differences favoring acupuncture (shifted to the left), with horizontal lines showing the 95% confidence intervals. The diamond symbol at the bottom reflects the pooled effect size.

 Figure 6 

Depiction of the effects of acupuncture on quality of life. Panel (A) presents the overall impact on quality of life, while panel (B) includes subgroup analyses by treatment type. In the forest plots, squares indicate standardized mean differences favoring acupuncture (shifted to the left), with horizontal lines representing the 95% confidence intervals. The diamond symbol at the bottom reflects the combined effect size.

This meta-analysis has several limitations. First, the variability in acupuncture protocols, including point selection, session duration, and frequency, may contribute to heterogeneity and affect the generalizability of results. Second, the lack of blinding in most included trials raises concerns about detection bias, as outcome assessors were aware of treatment allocations. Third, the limited number of trials investigating TENS restricts the ability to draw definitive conclusions about its efficacy relative to acupuncture. The small effects observed for TENS could be influenced by the variability in electrical parameters, such as frequency and intensity, across studies. Additionally, the superficial stimulation provided by TENS may not be sufficient to trigger meaningful changes in salivary gland activity for patients with severe radiation-induced damage. Fourth, the inclusion of RCTs from countries such as Sweden, Brazil, South Korea, the United States, China, the UK, and Canada enhances this meta-analysis by offering a comprehensive, global perspective on the use of acupuncture for managing radiation-induced xerostomia. However, the variation in patient populations, healthcare systems, and methodological approaches introduces potential heterogeneity that must be carefully addressed. Conducting subgroup analyses, where possible, could provide valuable insights into whether acupuncture's effectiveness differs across regions or specific population characteristics.

 Figure 7 

Shows a funnel plot summarizing the results from the studies included in Figure 3A. The lines illustrate the confidence intervals around the effect estimates, indicating the range where the true effect size is likely to fall. Circles represent individual studies included in the meta-analysis, with their size potentially reflecting the weight or sample size of each study; larger circles correspond to studies with greater weight or larger sample sizes. The diamond symbol denotes the overall effect estimate from the meta-analysis, with the center marking the pooled effect size and the width indicating the confidence interval for this estimate.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis provides robust evidence supporting the effectiveness of acupuncture in improving radiation-induced xerostomia. While heterogeneity and potential publication bias should be considered, the consistent benefits observed across multiple outcomes highlight acupuncture's value as a non-pharmacological intervention in this patient population.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary figures and tables.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Jhen-You Hu from the Taichung Municipal Taichung Girls' Senior High School, Taichung, Taiwan, for her valuable assistance in searching for RCTs for this meta-analysis.

Funding

This research was funded by Chung Shan Medical University (CSMU-INT-112-22).

CRediT Authorship Contribution Statement

Chin-Chang Chen: Data curation and Investigation. Sheng-Yi Lin: Data curation and Investigation. Yao Hsiao: Visualization. Ru-Yin Tsai: Designed research, Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted Technologies in the Writing Process

During the preparation of this work the authors used chatGPT4o to check grammar and improve the paper's readability but not to produce any content. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Data Availability Statement

Data included in article/supplementary material/referenced in article.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

References

1. Heiskanen V, Zadik Y, Elad S. Photobiomodulation Therapy for Cancer Treatment-Related Salivary Gland Dysfunction: A Systematic Review. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020;38:340-7

2. Dreizen S, Brown LR, Handler S, Levy BM. Radiation-induced xerostomia in cancer patients. Effect on salivary and serum electrolytes. Cancer. 1976;38:273-8

3. Garcia MK, Meng Z, Rosenthal DI, Shen Y, Chambers M, Yang P. et al. Effect of True and Sham Acupuncture on Radiation-Induced Xerostomia Among Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e1916910

4. Chambers MS, Rosenthal DI, Weber RS. Radiation-induced xerostomia. Head Neck. 2007;29:58-63

5. Cohen L, Danhauer SC, Garcia MK, Dressler EV, Rosenthal DI, Chambers MS. et al. Acupuncture for Chronic Radiation-Induced Xerostomia in Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7:e2410421

6. Mercadante V, Al Hamad A, Lodi G, Porter S, Fedele S. Interventions for the management of radiotherapy-induced xerostomia and hyposalivation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 2017;66:64-74

7. Simcock R, Fallowfield L, Monson K, Solis-Trapala I, Parlour L, Langridge C. et al. ARIX: a randomised trial of acupuncture v oral care sessions in patients with chronic xerostomia following treatment of head and neck cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:776-83

8. Wyatt G, Pugh SL, Wong RK, Sagar S, Singh AK, Koyfman SA. et al. Xerostomia health-related quality of life: NRG oncology RTOG 0537. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:2323-33

9. Braga FP, Lemos Junior CA, Alves FA, Migliari DA. Acupuncture for the prevention of radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer. Braz Oral Res. 2011;25:180-5

10. Meng Z, Kay Garcia M, Hu C, Chiang J, Chambers M, Rosenthal DI. et al. Sham-controlled, randomised, feasibility trial of acupuncture for prevention of radiation-induced xerostomia among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:1692-9

11. Higgins JPT, Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Second edition. ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. 2019

12. Wong RK, Sagar SM, Chen BJ, Yi GY, Cook R. Phase II Randomized Trial of Acupuncture-Like Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation to Prevent Radiation-Induced Xerostomia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients. J Soc Integr Oncol. 2010;8:35-42

13. Monson K, Parlour L, Simcock R, Fallowfield L, Jenkins V. Group recruitment sessions enhance patient understanding in a small multi-centre phase III clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33:286-90

14. Wong RK, James JL, Sagar S, Wyatt G, Nguyen-Tân PF, Singh AK. et al. Phase 2 results from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 0537: a phase 2/3 study comparing acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus pilocarpine in treating early radiation-induced xerostomia. Cancer. 2012;118:4244-52

15. Johnstone PA, Peng YP, May BC, Inouye WS, Niemtzow RC. Acupuncture for pilocarpine-resistant xerostomia following radiotherapy for head and neck malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50:353-7

16. Wong RK, Jones GW, Sagar SM, Babjak AF, Whelan T. A Phase I-II study in the use of acupuncture-like transcutaneous nerve stimulation in the treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer patients treated with radical radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:472-80

17. Mercadante V, Jensen SB, Smith DK, Bohlke K, Bauman J, Brennan MT. et al. Salivary Gland Hypofunction and/or Xerostomia Induced by Nonsurgical Cancer Therapies: ISOO/MASCC/ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:2825-43

18. Simcock R, Fallowfield L, Jenkins V. Group acupuncture to relieve radiation induced xerostomia: a feasibility study. Acupunct Med. 2009;27:109-13

19. Iovoli AJ, Ostrowski A, Rivers CI, Hermann GM, Groman A, Miller A. et al. Two- Versus Four-Times Weekly Acupuncture-Like Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Radiation-Induced Xerostomia: A Pilot Study. J Altern Complement Med. 2020;26:323-8

20. Blom M, Dawidson I, Fernberg JO, Johnson G, Angmar-Månsson B. Acupuncture treatment of patients with radiation-induced xerostomia. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol. 1996;32b:182-90

21. Cho JH, Chung WK, Kang W, Choi SM, Cho CK, Son CG. Manual acupuncture improved quality of life in cancer patients with radiation-induced xerostomia. J Altern Complement Med. 2008;14:523-6

22. Meng Z, Garcia MK, Hu C, Chiang J, Chambers M, Rosenthal DI. et al. Randomized controlled trial of acupuncture for prevention of radiation-induced xerostomia among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2012;118:3337-44

23. Wong RK, Deshmukh S, Wyatt G, Sagar S, Singh AK, Sultanem K. et al. Acupuncture-Like Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Versus Pilocarpine in Treating Radiation-Induced Xerostomia: Results of RTOG 0537 Phase 3 Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;92:220-7

24. Dalbem Paim E, Costa Batista Berbert M, Gonzales Zanella V, Beatris Martins V, Edler Macagnan F. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the salivary flow of patients with hyposalivation induced by radiotherapy in the head and neck region-A randomised clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46:1142-50

25. Ma Q. Somatotopic organization of autonomic reflexes by acupuncture. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2022;76:102602

26. Naik PN, Kiran RA, Yalamanchal S, Kumar VA, Goli S, Vashist N. Acupuncture: An Alternative Therapy in Dentistry and Its Possible Applications. Med Acupunct. 2014;26:308-14

27. O'Regan D, Filshie J. Acupuncture and cancer. Auton Neurosci. 2010;157:96-100

28. Hsiao SH, Tsai LJ. A neurovascular transmission model for acupuncture-induced nitric oxide. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2008;1:42-50

29. Zhuang L, Yang Z, Zeng X, Zhua X, Chen Z, Liu L. et al. The preventive and therapeutic effect of acupuncture for radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Integr Cancer Ther. 2013;12:197-205

30. O'Sullivan EM, Higginson IJ. Clinical effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of irradiation-induced xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Acupunct Med. 2010;28:191-9

31. Li N, Guo Y, Gong Y, Zhang Y, Fan W, Yao K. et al. The Anti-Inflammatory Actions and Mechanisms of Acupuncture from Acupoint to Target Organs via Neuro-Immune Regulation. J Inflamm Res. 2021;14:7191-224

32. Wang M, Liu W, Ge J, Liu S. The immunomodulatory mechanisms for acupuncture practice. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1147718

33. Llena-Puy C. The rôle of saliva in maintaining oral health and as an aid to diagnosis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006;11:E449-55

34. Pedersen A, Sorensen CE, Proctor GB, Carpenter GH. Salivary functions in mastication, taste and textural perception, swallowing and initial digestion. Oral Dis. 2018;24:1399-416

35. Aggarwal H, Pal-Singh M, Mathur H, Astekar S, Gulati P, Lakhani S. Evaluation of the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on whole salivary flow rate. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7:e13-7

36. Yan-Qiu L, Jun-Peng Y, Xiang-Yun Y, Wen W, Yu-Peng Z, Lu Y. et al. Advances in acupuncture regulation on the autonomic nervous system from 2013 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis via citespace. Complement Ther Med. 2024;80:103009

Author contact

Corresponding author: Ru-Yin Tsai, PhD, Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Sec. 1, Jianguo N. Rd, Taichung, Taiwan, Tel: +886 424730022 ext. 11613, e-mail: iris8084edu.tw.com.

Citation styles

©2025 Ivyspring International Publisher. Terms of use