Int J Med Sci 2020; 17(15):2285-2291. doi:10.7150/ijms.48772 This issue Cite

Research Paper

The efficacy of intramuscular ephedrine in preventing hemodynamic perturbations in patients with spinal anesthesia and dexmedetomidine sedation

Ji-Hyoung Park1, Jae-Kwang Shim2, Hyejin Hong1, Hyun Kyo Lim1,✉

1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea
2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Citation:
Park JH, Shim JK, Hong H, Lim HK. The efficacy of intramuscular ephedrine in preventing hemodynamic perturbations in patients with spinal anesthesia and dexmedetomidine sedation. Int J Med Sci 2020; 17(15):2285-2291. doi:10.7150/ijms.48772. https://www.medsci.org/v17p2285.htm
Other styles

File import instruction

Abstract

Dexmedetomidine is used for sedation during spinal anesthesia. The sympatholytic effect of dexmedetomidine may exacerbate hypotension and bradycardia with spinal anesthesia. This study investigated the effects of prophylactic intramuscular injection of ephedrine in preventing hypotension and bradycardia occurring through combined use of spinal anesthesia and dexmedetomidine. One hundred sixteen patients scheduled for lower extremity orthopedic surgery were randomized into two groups receiving either ephedrine 20 mg intramuscularly or equivalent amount of 0.9% NaCl, both with dexmedetomidine and spinal anesthesia. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hemodynamic perturbations (hypotension or bradycardia event). The secondary endpoint was a rescue doses of ephedrine and atropine. The incidence of hemodynamic perturbations was significantly lower in the ephedrine group compared with to the saline group (26.3% versus 55.9%, p = 0.001). The rescue doses of atropine (0.09 ± 0.21 versus 0.28 ± 0.41, p = 0.001) and ephedrine (1.04 ± 2.89 versus 2.03 ± 3.25, p = 0.007) were also significantly lower in the ephedrine group. There was no differences in number of patients with hypertensive (7.0% versus 11.9%, p = 0.375) or tachycardia (1.8% versus 3.4% p = 0.581) episodes. The use of ephedrine intramuscular injections may be a safe and efficacious option in preventing hemodynamic perturbations in patients who received spinal anesthesia and sedation using dexmedetomidine.

Keywords: Bradycardia, Dexmedetomidine, Ephedrine, Hypotension


Citation styles

APA
Park, J.H., Shim, J.K., Hong, H., Lim, H.K. (2020). The efficacy of intramuscular ephedrine in preventing hemodynamic perturbations in patients with spinal anesthesia and dexmedetomidine sedation. International Journal of Medical Sciences, 17(15), 2285-2291. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.48772.

ACS
Park, J.H.; Shim, J.K.; Hong, H.; Lim, H.K. The efficacy of intramuscular ephedrine in preventing hemodynamic perturbations in patients with spinal anesthesia and dexmedetomidine sedation. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 17 (15), 2285-2291. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.48772.

NLM
Park JH, Shim JK, Hong H, Lim HK. The efficacy of intramuscular ephedrine in preventing hemodynamic perturbations in patients with spinal anesthesia and dexmedetomidine sedation. Int J Med Sci 2020; 17(15):2285-2291. doi:10.7150/ijms.48772. https://www.medsci.org/v17p2285.htm

CSE
Park JH, Shim JK, Hong H, Lim HK. 2020. The efficacy of intramuscular ephedrine in preventing hemodynamic perturbations in patients with spinal anesthesia and dexmedetomidine sedation. Int J Med Sci. 17(15):2285-2291.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
Popup Image